Some preserved sites.
Some history and culture
Controversies Concerning Archaeology
American Indian Voices
News Archive Index
Return to main Learn page
Please inform the webmaster of any broken links!
An undisturbing development
October 20, 2002
COLUMBUS, Ohio (AP) - "The Ohio Historical Society has told its
archaeologists to keep their hands off prehistoric human remains they may
find during excavations.
The society has issued a memo saying the remains are to be left in place,
except in special circumstances.
"They are to note it, mark it but not do any further excavations until we
feel more comfortable with our relations to native peoples," said Rachel
Tooker, the society's chief operating officer.
Previously, skeletal material routinely was returned to the Ohio Historical
Center in Columbus for study and storage. The society's collection as of
last year included about 6,500 individual pieces or sets of human remains
and 107,000 artifacts from graves.
"I kind of hated to make this the issue," Tooker said. "Our bottom line is
to improve communications with tribal groups."
American Indian groups said they welcome the move but won't be satisfied
until all remains and grave artifacts now in collections are returned to
them for reburial.
"We think this is a very good thing, and we're happy Rachel put it in
place," said Barbara Mann of Toledo, a spokeswoman for the Native American
Alliance of Ohio. "But it's high time. Ohio is behind the times, and Rachel
is trying to pull [the society] into the 21st century."
The moratorium was imposed in late July. Mann believes it's a reaction to
publicity the society received last spring when it removed three prehistoric
Indian skeletons during construction at the Fort Meigs State Memorial in
The society still has the skeletons but has returned six other skeletons
from a 19th century settler's graveyard disturbed at the same site to the
settler's descendants for reburial.
The Native American Graves Protection and Repatriation Act of 1990 requires
archaeologists to report Indian remains and artifacts in their collections
and establishes how federally recognized tribes can reclaim them.
The law controls how remains and artifacts are handled after they are
collected but doesn't deal with whether grave objects should be removed or
The society's memo on what to do when remains are found says their location
will be recorded and provisions will be made to safeguard them from
disturbance and vandalism.
Decisions will be made on a case-by-case basis if the graves lie in the path
of construction or are in a "disturbed" state.
The moratorium on disturbing remains does not deal with artifacts, such as
jewelry or ceremonial objects, or with items already in the society's
Archaeologists say this will mean the loss of some scientific information,
but they appear to be accepting the restrictions as inevitable.
"This is becoming more and more the norm," said Brian Redmond, president of
the Ohio Archaeological Council. "We've had a similar policy at the
Cleveland Museum of Natural History since the 1980s: If something is not in
danger of being destroyed, we let it remain."
© 2002 The Plain Dealer.
Posted by Mikola 18 -- NDN AIM
Go to News Archive Index